Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Simple Algebeera

Pilsner ≠ light beer
Pilsner ≠ Bud/Miller/Coors
Pilsner ≠ over hopped Bud
Pilsner ≠ any old pale lager

Pilsner = triple decoction mashing
Pilsner = only Saaz hops
Pilsner = malty backbone with hoppy bite
Pilsner = minimum 30 days lagering

Questions? No? Good.

8 comments:

  1. Just to be a pain in the arse, what about German Pilsner?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Still steaming over that Ur-Pils review?

    ReplyDelete
  3. On the subject of decoction, what do you think of this? :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree entirely with Jason in the original post.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Shit, I should have read Jason's piece before asking :D I have to admit, I'm not sure I like the German preoccupation with decoction, as I don't think it's necessary for everything (and it seems like it's used for everything here, not that I can back that up with hard facts). Although I dislike fundamentalism of any sort.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I guess I am a Pilsner fundamentalist in many ways - or at least I want those beers laying claiming to the name "pilsner" to at least be a close approximation of the original.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I remember years ago, my late father in law had some Miller High life in the fridge. I was thirsty and asked if it was any good? Clearly it was a light beer... his response was "Well, it's a Pilsner". I took it to mean that because it was a Pilsner, that made it better than just an average light beer.
    As light beers go, not the worst I have to say but as beer in general goes? Yeah... nuff said.

    ReplyDelete
  8. And as pilsners go, a downright abomination.

    This is perhaps the problem of pilsner in America, so few people actually know what one is.

    ReplyDelete

Half Cut

Decisions, decisions, an excess of choice is not always a good thing. There are times when I sit agonising over a beer list trying to deci...